Sunday, October 20, 2013
Un-Apologetic, Part 2: Miracles
Let's begin by looking at the latter example from Matthew 8:23-27:
"Now when He got into a boat, His disciples followed Him. And suddenly a great tempest arose on the sea, so that the boat was covered with the waves. But He was asleep. Then His disciples came to Him and awoke Him, saying, 'Lord, save us! We are perishing!'
But He said to them, 'Why are you fearful, O you of little faith?' Then He arose and rebuked the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm. So the men marveled, saying, 'Who can this be, that even the winds and the sea obey Him?'"
It's clearly understood from the text that what happened here was not a mere passing of a storm. No, this is something that defied the laws of nature. I've heard people describe miracles in broader terms, but for the sake of this here argument, that's what I'm talking about.
What did such signs accomplish? Well, for starters, it gave His followers a reason to believe. John 2:11, which follows the account of the wine from water miracle, says, "This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him." Even many among those who had not become followers couldn't deny the power implied by His miracles. In Acts 2:22 Peter appeals to them, "Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know—" There's a common knowledge among all mankind that miracles are from a higher power. Why is that? Well, because we understand deep down that God, by His very nature, is above the laws of nature that He established.
So what does this have to do with evolution? As I mentioned in the previous post, evolution is born from the viewpoint of naturalism, which by its very definition requires that all things natural be conformed to the laws of nature, and their coming into existence be subject to those laws. Theistic evolution assumes that where the theory of evolution ends, God steps in and fills the gaps. What I mean is, evolution explains how we came about through naturalistic processes, but God gave the initial spark, and from this point forward simply holds the universe together according to the laws of nature. That's not to say that He's not involved in our lives, or doesn't answer our prayers, or wasn't responsible for our souls being born. In fact, you'd be hard-pressed to find any Christians who view God in such a hands-off kind of way. The difference with young-earth creationists like myself is that we disagree that God was bound to the laws of nature when it came to the creation of the universe. We believe that the creation account in Genesis was an account of miraculous historical events.
Understanding that miracles are a sign that God holds power over the laws of nature, it seems hard to believe that He would have limited Himself in any way in the act of creating. God is not a slave to the laws He created. If He were, those laws would be god, and God would be no different than Bertrand Russell's floating teapot in space or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, whichever you prefer. This is why I have no problem with issues concerning such things as the distance of the stars in relation to the speed of light. From a purely naturalistic point-of-view, it would be impossible for their light to reach us in a young-earth scenario. But if God wanted the light to reach us so we could be reminded of His glory in the heavens, He could make it happen instantaneously, just as He instantaneously calmed the seas. Time is not a restraint for God. In fact, God transcends time. He is eternal, which is a concept that we as humans are simply incapable of grasping. We are limited in our understanding to the things of this universe that we are bound to because that's all we know. How can we possibly comprehend God without being God? In our modern thinking, we seek to put everything in a box, but God cannot be contained. Why not instead embrace the mystery of His greatness?
My great concern for the adherents of theistic evolution moving forward is, "Where does it end?" When you give credence to the consensus opinion of the naturalistic science community in this area, will you also adopt their views as they develop consensus theories on how the stuff that became the universe (pre-"Big Bang"), time, and the first life began? This is why I began this study from the conspiracy angle. As long as you give respect to the views of those who greatly desire to define your existence apart from God, you will continue to see your understanding of God's power erode until all you're left with is a hope for God's existence with no grounding in reality: blind faith in the Incredible Shrinking God. Such a god is no God at all, because any god whose power is subject to the opinion of godless Man is inferior to him, thus making Man god. Where will you draw the line in the sand? How far will you follow them down the godless-shaped hole that is naturalism? The day is fast approaching when they will have all the "answers." Are you ready to defend your faith?
"Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men." (1 Corinthians 1:20-25)