Some
of you may be unfamiliar with the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or maybe
you’ve seen the Jesus-fish-like FSM decal on the back of the car in
front of you and wondered what that is all about. I thought I would take
this opportunity to explain what it is and to thoroughly debunk it.
The
FSM is an invention of atheism/agnosticism that equates the belief in
God to the belief in the monster based on the fact that neither can be
seen or physically proven, therefore neither can also be disproven. It
is a modern version of Russell’s Teapot. In 1952, philosopher Bertrand
Russell argued,
“If I were to suggest that between the Earth and
Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical
orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were
careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our
most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my
assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part
of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking
nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in
ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled
into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its
existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to
the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the
Inquisitor in an earlier time.”
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is
rooted in the same argument, only instead of a teapot, it is a
“god-like” creature with a body of noodles and meatball eyes. The term
was invented in 2005 in a letter from a 24-year old Oregon State
graduate, Bobby Henderson, protesting the decision to permit the
teaching of intelligent design in public schools in Kansas. The key
difference between the teapot and the FSM is the level of mockery
towards the idea of God. In the case of the teapot, Russell wasn’t
arguing that it was God, but rather that it couldn’t be proven or
disproven. The FSM is designed to make the idea of God seem ridiculous
and stupid. It has become incredibly popular with atheists and agnostics
in these past 10 years, and has been promoted by the world’s most
famous skeptic, Richard Dawkins. They love to equate their “god” with
God, but I’d like to demonstrate why that comparison is as stupid as the
very idea of a spaghetti god.
The comparison fails for one big
reason: there is absolutely no reason to believe in the FSM. On the
other hand, there is very good reason to believe in the Christian God.
For starters, God cannot be less than His creation. Spaghetti cannot
explain chicken or cats or people. It certainly cannot produce
intelligence. Spaghetti can only explain itself. If the universe were
entirely spaghetti-like, we may have good reason to believe in a
spaghetti god. Perhaps if our bodies or the ground we walked on, and
everything that we saw resembled spaghetti, we might have reason to
suspect origins of spaghetti. On the other hand, we believe in the God
of the Bible because we do see Him in creation. We believe that God is
intelligent because we are intelligent. We believe that God is
immeasurable, because the universe is immeasurable. We believe that God
is personal, because we are personal. Likewise, we believe that God is
loving and cares for His children because we humans love and care for
our children. The creation cannot be greater than the Creator. The FSM
is subject to creation, a mere product, limited by time and space. The
God of the Bible created time and space and Himself transcends their
limitations. If there is no God, we have a lot of explaining to do, and
in fact, are more likely to resort to such idiotic ideas as the FSM to
explain the existence of anything. Throughout history, humans have
invented countless gods that much more closely resemble the FSM, that
merely are gods over something like rain or thunder, and are themselves
limited. God, by His definition, is unlimited. He is greater than His
creation. If creation is greater than God, than He ceases to be God, and
the creation becomes god over Him. These are childish, unsophisticated
ideas of what a god is, and therefore wholly irrelevant to comparisons
with the Christian God.
The God of the Bible is complex. His
triune nature is incomprehensible to the human mind. We are not capable
of grasping Him fully, because we are not Him. We are lesser. The only
reason we can understand anything specific about Him is because He has
revealed it to us through nature, through His Scriptures, and through
the visible life of Jesus Christ. To say that belief in God is as
unsubstantiated as belief in the FSM is to deny history. We have the
revealed Word of God, given to us over thousands of years, put down by
roughly 40 human writers that testify to historical events, the rise and
fall of kings and empires, as well as the lives of individuals who
lived in those times. Most importantly, we have the accounts of the life
of the Son of God, Jesus Christ. His life and death and resurrection
resulted in the explosion of Christianity, which remains to this day the
most influential force in the shaping of the world we live in today. No
other religion has impacted the world like Christianity has. Many
religions have shaped their surroundings, but none have had the global
impact of Christianity. It only makes sense that if there is a God who
claims to be personal, and to be interested in the lives of men, that
there would be evidence of His existence in the world. He would be
effective. There is no evidence of the life of the FSM. He has made no
impact on our world. As far as “gods” go, he has done a pretty lousy job
at getting his message across, if he has any. He is powerless, and he
is dead. He never was, and there was never a reason to believe in him.
Our God is alive, and every attempt to destroy Him has ended with Him
victorious.
“For the message of the cross is foolishness to
those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power
of God. For it is written:
‘I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.’
Where
is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age?
Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For since, in the
wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God
through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who
believe. For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we
preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks
foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ
the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God
is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.” (1
Corinthians 1:18-25)